At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association
convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on the
history of gun ownership, gun use, and gun violence in the United States. Our
purpose was to consider how social science history might contribute to the
public debate over gun control and gun rights. To date, we have had little
impact on that debate. It has been dominated by mainstream social scientists and
historians, especially scholars such as Gary Kleck, John Lott, and Michael
Bellesiles, whose work, despite profound flaws, is politically congenial to
either opponents or proponents of gun control. Kleck A. It has little influence on the forum sponsored by the Crime and Justice network. B. Neither supporters nor opponents of gun control cite the works of scholars. C. The works of mainstream social scientists have great impact on it. D. Many social science historians have so far failed to take part in it. 更多"Directions: In this part there are "的相关试题:我来回答: 提交
|