更多"Two cars left the same town traveli"的相关试题:
[单项选择]Cars X and Y were traveling together on a straight road at a constant speed of 55 miles per hour when car X stopped for 5 minutes. If car Y continued to travel at 55 miles per hour, how many minutes from the time that car X resumed traveling did it take car X traveling at 60 miles per hour to catch up with car Y ？（） (Assume that the time for car X to slow down and speed up was negligible.)
A. 5
B. 30
C. 45
D. 55
E. 60
[单项选择]Mechanical toy cars A，B，and C，each traveling at its own uniform rate，started from the same point at the same time and raced a 400-meter course．
When A crossed the finish line．B was 40meters behind A，and C was 58 meters behind A．
When B crossed the finish line，how many meters was C from the finish line
A. 16B. 18C. 19D. 20E. 22
[单项选择]Two companies operating in the same industry both achieved the same return on equity with the same net sales, but the two companies were different with respect to return on total assets. Compared with the company that had the higher return on total assets, the company with the lower return on total assets most likely had a higher:（）
A. total asset turnover.
B. financial leverage multiplier.
C. proportion of common equity in its capital structure.
[单项选择]Two companies in the same industry are similar in all aspects except that the average age of the depreciable assets for Company B is 10 times greater than the average age of the depreciable assets for Company A. Which of the following statements is least likely true Company B will have:（）
A. lower depreciation expense.
B. higher earnings.
C. a competitive advantage in the future.
[单项选择]Two related paradoxes also emerge from the same basic conception of the aesthetic experience. The first was given extended consideration by Hegel, who argued roughly as follows: our sensuous attention and that gives to the work of art its peculiar individuality. Because it addresses itself to our sensory appreciation, the work of art is essentially concrete, to be understood by an act of perception rather than by a process of discursive thought.
At the same time, our understanding of the work of art is in part intellectual; we seek in it a conceptual content, which it presents to us in the form of an idea. One purpose of critical interpretation is to expound this idea in discursive form—to give the equivalent of the content of the work of art in another, nonsensuous idiom. But criticism can never succeed in this task, for, by separating the content from the particular form, it abolishes its individuality. The content presented then ceases to be the exact content of that work of ar
A. The content and form of the work of art cannot be separated from each other.
B. The content of the work of art is always the true object of aesthetic interest.
C. The content presented without any individuality is not the content of the work of art.
D. The content understood by means of a process of discursive thought is no more than a husk.
