更多"The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision M"的相关试题:
[单项选择]The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Monday to let stand a ruling in an online defamation case will make it more difficult to determine correct legal jurisdictions in other Internet eases, legal experts said.
By opting not to take the case, the high court effectively endorsed a lower court’s decision that a Colorado company that posts ratings of health plans on the Internet could be sued for defamation in a Washington court. The lower court ruling is one of several that makes it easier for plaintiffs to sue Web site operators in their own jurisdictions, rather than where the operators maintain a physical presence.
The case involved a defamation suit filed by Chehalis, Wash.-based Northwest Healthcare Alliance against Lakewood, Colo. -based Healthgrades.com. The Alliance sued in Washington federal court after Healthgrades. com posted a negative ranking of Northwest Healthcare’s home health services on the Internet. Healthgrades. com argued that it should not be subject to the ju
A. can cause operators to issue balanced health plan ratings.
B. renders correct legal decisions in other cases impossible.
C. might put Web site operators at a legal disadvantage.
D. brings about a series of debates on Internet operations.
[单项选择]The U. S, Supreme Court’s decision Monday to let stand a ruling in an online defamation case will make it more difficult to determine correct legal jurisdictions in other Internet cases, legal experts said.
By opting not to take the case, the high court effectively endorsed a lower court’s decision that a Colorado company that posts ratings of health plans on the Internet could be sued for defamation in a Washington court. The lower court ruling is one of several that makes it easier for plaintiffs to sue Web site operators in their own jurisdictions, rather than where the operators maintain a physical presence.
The case involved a defamation suit filed by Chehalis, Wash.-based -Northwest Healthcare Alliance against Lakewood, Colo. based Healthgrades. com. The Alliance sued in Washington federal, court after Healthgrades. com posted a negative ranking of Northwest Healthcare’s home health services on the Internet. Healthgrades. com argued that it should not be subject to the
A. puts Web site operators at a legal disadvantage
B. renders correct legal decisions in other cases impossible
C. brings about a series of incorrect legal rulings
D. causes operators to issue balanced health plans
[单项选择]
The U. S, Supreme Court’s decision Monday to let stand a ruling in an online defamation case will make it more difficult to determine correct legal jurisdictions in other Internet cases, legal experts said.
By opting not to take the case, the high court effectively endorsed a lower court’s decision that a Colorado company that posts ratings of health plans on the Internet could be sued for defamation in a Washington court. The lower court ruling is one of several that makes it easier for plaintiffs to sue Web site operators in their own jurisdictions, rather than where the operators maintain a physical presence.
The case involved a defamation suit filed by Chehalis, Wash.-based -Northwest Healthcare Alliance against Lakewood, Colo. based Healthgrades. com. The Alliance sued in Washington federal, court after Healthgrades. com posted a negative ranking of Northwest Healthcare’s home health services on the Internet. Healthgrades. com argued that it
A. puts Web site operators at a legal disadvantage
B. renders correct legal decisions in other cases impossible
C. brings about a series of incorrect legal rulings
D. causes operators to issue balanced health plans