[单项选择]Nothing more unlucky, I sometimes think, could have befallen Chaucer than that he should have been christened "the father of English Line poetry." For "father" in such a context conveys to (5) most of us, I fear, a faint suggestion of vicarious glory—the derivative celebrity of parents, other- wise obscure, who shine, moon-like, in the reflected luster of their sons. What else than progenitors were the fathers of Plato, or Caesar, (10) or Shakespeare, or Napoleon And so to call Chaucer the father of English poetry is often tan- tamount to dismissing him, not unkindly, as the estimable but archaic ancestor of a brilliant line. But Chaucer—if I may risk the paradox—is him- (15) self the very thing he begat. He is English poetry incarnate, and only two, perhaps, of all his sons outshine his fame. It is with Chaucer himself,
A. skeptical but resigned B. admiring and intrigued C. dismissive D. incredulous E. (E) completely detached