In 1837, the nation was gripped by financial panic, yet, Procter and Gamble launched their new enterprise, more concerned about how to compete with the 14 other soap and candle makers in their city. Their calm in the midst of that economic storm reflected their forward-looking approach to the business—an approach that became the hallmark of Procter & Gamble.
Later, they pioneered one of the nation’s first profit-sharing programs and were among the first in American industry to invest in a research laboratory. By 1890, the fledgfing partnership between Procter and Gamble had grown into a multinational corporation. Nevertheless, P & G still had its eyes on the future.
At that time, P & G was selling more than 30 different types of soap, including Ivory. Fueled by innovative advertising, including full color print ads in national magazines, consumers’ demand
A. their future-oriented vision.
B. their power to compete.
C. the quality of their products.
D. their harmonious cooperation.
In 1837, the nation was gripped by financial panic, yet, Procter and Gamble launched their new enterprise, more concerned about how to compete with the 14 other soap and candle makers in their city. Their calm in the midst of that economic storm reflected their forward-looking approach to the business—an approach that became the hallmark of Procter & Gamble.
Later, they pioneered one of the nation’s first profit-sharing programs and were among the first in American industry to invest in a research laboratory. By 1890, the fledgfing partnership between Procter and Gamble had grown into a multinational corporation. Nevertheless, P & G still had its eyes on the future.
At that time, P & G was selling more than 30 different types of soap, including Ivory. Fueled by innovative advertising, including full color print ads in national magazines, consumers’ demand
A. Vision, research and hard working.
B. Wise investment, research laboratory and enough capital.
C. Vision, profit-sharing programs and research.
D. Vision, laboratory research and innovation.
"Universal history, the history of what man has accomplished in this world, is at bottom the History of the Great Men who have worked here," wrote the Victorian stage Thomas Carlyle. Well, not any more it is not.
Suddenly, Britain looks to have fallen out with its favourite historical form. This could be no more than a passing literary craze, but it also points to a broader truth about how we now approach the past: less concerned with learning from forefathers and more interested in feeling their pain. Today, we want empathy, not inspiration.
From the earliest days of the Renaissance, the writing of history meant recounting the exemplary lives of great men. In 1337, Petrarch began work on his rambling writing De Viris Illustribus—On Famous Men, highlighting the virtus (or virtue) of classical heroes. Petrarch celebrated their greatness in conquering fortune and rising to the top. This was the biographical tradition which Niccolo Machiavelli turned
我来回答: