更多"He must have had an accident, or he"的相关试题:
[填空题]He must have had an accident, or he______(早就应该在这儿了) then.
[单项选择]He must have had an accident, or he ______ here then.
A. should be
B. would be
C. could have been
D. would have been
[单项选择]He must have had an accident, or he ______ then.
A. would have been here
B. had to be here
C. should be here
D. would be here
[填空题]He said that the driver must have had an accident; otherwise he __________________ (当时应该已经到了).
[单项选择]He had studied hard, he would have been able to pass the exam.（ ）
A. He had studied harder
B. If only he studied more
C. Had he studied harder
D. When he studied more
[简答题]Driving again after his accident must________________(需要很大的勇气) .
[单项选择]I have told my friend that if I had known he was in hot water, I would go and help him out.
A. knew
B. was knowing
C. should know
D. will know
[单项选择]Analysts have had their go at humor, and I have read some of this interpretative literature, but without being greatly instructed. Humor can be dissected, as a frog can, but the thing dies in the process and the innards (内在部分) are discouraging to any but the pure scientific mind.
In a newsreel theatre the other day I saw a picture of a man who had developed the soap bubble to a higher point than it had ever before reached. He had become the ace soap bubble blower of America, had perfected the business of blowing bubbles, refined it, doubled it, squared it, and had even worked himself up into a convenient lather. The effect was not pretty. Some of the bubbles were too big to be beautiful, and the blower was always jumping into them or out of them, or playing some sort of unattractive trick with them. It was, if anything, a rather repulsive sight. Humor is a little like that: it won’t stand much blowing up, and it won’t stand much poking. It has a certain fragility, an evasiveness,
A. just as scientists can dissect a frog, so analysts can dissect humor
B. detailed, scientific analysis is not appropriate for humor, for it may make humor lose its aesthetic value
C. some people’s analysis of humor are too scientific
D. analysts’ attempts at humor am not instructive enough to interest the author
