更多"[单选题]（ ）When we saw his face，we kne"的相关试题:
[单选题]If it __________ for his bad cold, Rick would have enjoyed more on his birthday party.
A.is not
B.were not
C.has not been
D.had not been
[单选题] She saw （） boy playing with his dog.
A. eight-year-old
B.an eight-years-old
C.an eight-year-old
D.a eight-years-old
[单选题]I second his motion that we（ ）a special board to examine.
A.shall set up
B.should set up
C.will set up
D.would set up
[单选题]The fact_______his health is bad is not true.
A.which
B.that
C.as
D.what
[判断题] We have the society under control and I have confiscated his cigarettes and lighter. ( )
A.正确
B.错误
[单选题]He was made__his working because of his poor health.
A.to give up
B.given up
C.give up
D.giving up
[单选题]The children cheered up when they saw hundreds of colorful balloons（ ）slowly into the sky.
A.floating
B.raising
C.heaving
D.ascending
[单选题]题目 24
He promised _____his old friend during his stay in Tianjin.
A.see
B.seeing
C.saw
D.to see
[单选题] I saw the boy（） the classroom.
A. enter into
B. enter
C. to enter into
D. to enter
[单选题]By measuring his radials from _______ VOR station, a pilot can check his position.
A.one
B.more than one
C.two
D.only two
[单选题]题目 126
O.ld Mr Black lives happily with his three dogs. ( )of them are part of his family.
A. Both
B. All
C. None
D. Neither
[判断题]在RNase（核糖核酸酶）分子中存在His12、His119侧链的咪唑基及Lys41-NH3由于多肽链是按特定方式折叠成一定空间结构，这三个在一级结构上相距甚远的氨基酸残基才彼此靠近构成RNase的催化中心。（ ）
A.正确
B.错误
[单选题]题目 2
Old Mr Black lives happily with his three dogs. _____of them are part of his family.
A.Both
B.All
C.None
D.Neither
[简答题]When we discuss the English language,we illuminate our weaknesses,prejudices and ambitions.Language creates communities,and some of these are solidarities of complainers and pedants.A statement about proper English is a statement not only about the language,but also about people-about who the proper English are,or just about who the proper users of English are.Typically,the celebrants and defenders of proper English are celebrating or defending something other than language.Where does our sense of the sproper'come from?In arguing about what is right and what wrong in any language,we appeal to authority.This authority is embodied in academies,the Ministry of Education（or its equivalent）and universities,as well as in the pronouncements of people who have appointed themselves authorities and have become known as such.We commonly accept these judges'pronouncements.There are also geographical criteria.These are evident in statements such as'Natives of Perugia speak the best Italian'or'People in Alsace have funny accents'.Typically,we feel that there are certain environments in which our language is decently used,and we favour the usage that obtains there.Sometimes,too,we defer to the example of a significant literary figure,saying that so-and-so is a model of correctness.A broader view is that'correct English is that which is used by the best writers',but who are they,and what are the criteria for their being so esteemed?The definition tends to be circular:the best writers are the ones who best use the resources of English.When we appeal to aesthetics,our arguments become vague.The aesthetically sensitive arbiter will argue that whatever is beautiful in language is good.（49）The problem here would seem to be that the desire for beautiful language concentrates on language as an object-on the sensory pleasure it affords rather than on what it signifies.Besides,as we know from our observation of others,the constant pursuit of beauty can be embarrassing.Alternatively,we may claim that the most elegant usage is that of the social elite.Perhaps this now seems an absurd position,but not long ago it would have been perfectly normal.The democratic option is to say that all doubtful matters should be decided by ballot,or just to say that the majority is right.We also appeal to logic.（50）Although there are discrepancies between logic and the ways we use language,we frequently use arguments from logic（or from what we imagine to be logic）in order to justify our choice of words or find fault with others'choices.In practice we tend to find our usual practices logical and anything else illogical.'Logic'is often a mask for arrogance and extreme patriotism.
[简答题]We experience a burst of pleasure when we share our thoughts,and this drives us to communlcate.It is a useful feature of our brain,because it ensures that knowledge,experience and ideas do not get buried with the person who first had them,and that as a society we benefit from the products of many minds.Of course,in order for that to happen,merely sharing is not enough.We need to cause a reaction.Each time we share our opinions and knowledge,it is with the intention of having an impact on others.Here's the problem,though:we approach this task from inside our own heads.When attempting to create impact,we reflect on what is persuasive to us,our state of mind.our desires and our goals.But if we want to affect the behaviours and beliefs of the person in front of us,we need to understand what goes on inside their head.
