更多"[单选题]Quality planning tools are oft"的相关试题:
[单选题]Diagnostic test is often used for the purpose of__________.
A.finding out what students know and don' t know
B.measuring students' general language proficiency
C.knowing whether students have the right language aptitude
D.checking whether students have achieved the teaching objectives
[单选题]The seven basic quality tools are used within in the context of the PDCA Cycle to solve quality-relatd problems.These tools are used in（ ）in the following processes.
A.Plan quality management
B.Perform quality assurance
C.Perform quality control
D.Perform quality improvement
[单选题]Many useful tools and techniques are used in developing schedule． （ ） is a schedule network analysis technique that modifies the project schedule to account for limited resource．
A.PERT
A.Resource levelling
B.Schedule compression
C.Critical chain metho
D.
[单选题]()is one of the quality planning outputs.
A.Scope base line
B.Cost of quality
C.Product specification
D.Quality checklist
[单选题]（ ） is the output of the quality planning．
A.Scope baseline
B.Cost of quality
C.Scope checklist
D.Quality checklist
[单选题]Success often depends on temperament.
A.education
B.aristocracy
C.disposition
D.experience
[单选题]Language teachers often extract examples from grammar books.
A.pull out
B.repair
C.takes
D.dig
[单选题]He often mocks my French accent.
A.praise
B.belittle
C.mark
D.laugh at
[单选题]Developing the project schedule is often an
iterative process. It determines the planned start and finish dates for project
activities and milestones. Schedule development can require the review and
revision of duration estimates and resource estimates to create an approved
project schedule that can serve as a baseline to （ ） progress.
A.analyze
A.track
B.level
C.exten
D.
[不定项选择题]Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.
A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure “gender parity” on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.
Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.
The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.
The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an “important” policy interest, Because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of “equal protection”.
But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the percentage of women in the general population, but so what?
The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.
Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.
Writing in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a “golden skirt” phenomenon, where the same elite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.
Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do little to help average women.
Which of the following can be inferred from the text?
A.Women’s need in employment should be considered.
B.Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.
C.Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.
D.Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.
[单选题]Customers often defer payment for as long as possible.
A.make
B.demand
C.postpone
D.obtain
