更多"what can we inter about Peter Melch"的相关试题:
[Part III Reading Comprehension]
What can we learn from the results for individual cancers?
A.Women who always ate organic food are more likely to develop non-Hodgkinlymphoma.
B.Women who never ate organic food are more likely to develop breast cancer .
C.Women who never ate organic food are more Likely to develop non-Hodgkinlymphoma.
D.Women who always ate organic food are much more likely to develop breast cancer.
[Part III Reading Comprehension]
What do we learn about Lauryn Watkoske?
A.She is majoring in Engineering at Kettering University.
B.She promotes the development of robotically assisted surgery .
C.She prefers to build things rather than study Robotics .
D.She has interest in math and science-related careers .
[Part III Reading Comprehension]
What do we learn about those who have been unemployed for a long time?
A.They stop looking for work due to the loss Of identity .
B.unemployment benefits can lift up their spirits.
C.They may die earlier than those With jobs.
D.Retirement can make them happier .
[单选题]What do we learn about Wolfe from the passage
A.He tried hard to remember what was in the classroom.
B.He stayed in the classroom for a short time.
C.He stayed drew a picture of Washington Square.
D.He followed the author into the classroom.
[不定项选择题]What can be done about mass unemployment All the wise heads agree:there’re no quick or any answers.There’s work to be done,but workers aren’t ready to do it.They’re in the wrong places,or they have the wrong skills.Our problem are
“structural,”and will take many years to solve.
But don’t bother asking for evidence that justifies this bleak view.There isn’t any.On the contrary,all the facts suggest
that high unemployment in America is the result of inadequate demand.Saying that there’re no easy answers sounds wise,
but it’s actually foolish:our unemployment crisis could be cured very quickly if we had the intellectual clarity and political will
to act.In other words,structural unemployment is a fake problem,which mainly serves as an excuse for not pursuing real
solutions.The fact is job openings have plunged in every major sector,while the number of workers forced into part-time
employment in almost all industries has soared.Unemployment has surged in every major occupational category.Only three
states,with a combined population not much larger than that of Brooklyn,have unemployment rates below 5%.So the
evidence contradicts the claim that we’re mainly suffering from structural unemployment.Why,then,has this claim become so popular
Part of the answer is that this is what always happens during periods of high unemployment-in part because experts and analysts believe that declaring the problem the problem deeply rooted,with no easy answers,makes them sound serious.I’ve been looking at what self-proclaimed experts were saying about unemployment during the Great Depression;it was almost
identical to what Very Serious People are saying now.Unemployment cannot be brought down rapidly,declared one 1935
analysis,because the workforce is“unadaptable and untrained”.I cannot respond to the opportunities which industry may
offer.A few years later,a large defense buildup finally provided a fiscal stimulus adequate to the economy’s needs an
D.suddenly industry was eager to employ those“unadaptable and untrained”workers.But now,as then,powerful forces are
ideologically opposed to the whole idea of government action on a sufficient scale to jump-start the economy.And that,
fundamentally,is why claims that we face huge structural problems have been multiplying:they offer a reason to do nothing
about the mass unemployment that is crippling our economy and our society.
So what you need to know is that there's no evidence whatsoever to back these claims.We aren't suffering from a
shortage of needed skills;we’re suffering from a lack of policy resolve.As I said,structural unemployment isn’t real problem,
it's an excuse-a reason not to act on America’s problems at a time when action is desperately needed.
What is the author’s purpose in writing the passage 《》（）
A.To testify to the experts’analysis of America’s problems.
B.To offer a feasible solution to the structural unemployment.
C.To show the urgent need for the government to take action.
D.To alert American workers to the urgency for adaptation.
[单选题]What kind of sounds can we make when the vocal cords are vibrating?
A.Voiceless
A.Voice
B.
C.Glottal stop
D.Consonant
[单选题]What can be inferred from the passage
A.The author was happy to see the test result.
B.What the students said was hardly true.
C.Wolfe would remember forever what the author had done.
D.Wolfe felt joyful after he had been tested.
[不定项选择题]What can be inferred from the last paragraph?
A.Babies’ cries have long been the concerns of scientists.
B.Babies start their speech acquisition at the age of three months.
C.Studying babies' cries helps us understand their speech perception.
D.Babies’ true speech, rather than their cries, should be the focus of study.
[单选题]What can cloze help to train in terms of writing
A.Unity of texts.
B.Indention of texts.缩进
C.Compilation of texts.编辑
D.Use of cohesive devices.衔接手段
[单选题]Passage Four
How can we get rid of garbage?Do we have enough energy sources to meet our future energy needs?
These are two important questions that many people are asking today．Some people think that man might be able to solve both problems at the same time,They suggest using garbage as an energy source,and at the same time it can save the land to hold garbage．
For a long time,people buried garbage or dumped it on empty land．Now,empty land is scarce．But more and more garbage is produced each year．However,garbage can be a good fuel to use．The things in garbage do not look like coal,petroleum,or natural gas;but they are chemically similar to these fossil fuels．As we use up our fossil-fuel supplies,we might be able to use garbage as an energy source．Burning garbage is not a new idea．Some cities in Europe and the United States have been burning garbage for years．The heat that is produced by burning garbage is used to boil water．The steam that is produced is used to make electricity or to heat nearby,buildings．In Paris,France,some power plants burn almost 2 million metric tons of the cities garbage each year．The amount of energy produced is about the same as would be produced by burning almost a half million barrels of oil．
Our fossil fuel supplies are limited．Burning garbage might be one kind of energy source that we can use to help meet our energy needs．This method could also reduce the amount if garbage piling up on the earth．
What is the author's attitude?
A.Delighte
B.Sad
C.Agree in
D.Disagree in
